![]() Efficiency or effectiveness?Īchieving the right level of efficiency and effectiveness starts with the leadership. After all, what’s the purpose of optimizing resources if you’re delivering subpar work? And how effective are you really being if your work is consistently behind schedule? Real productivity isn’t achieved without first striking the right balance between efficiency and effectiveness. You can probably see why efficiency and effectiveness are both important traits. ![]() An example of this would be an employee who came up with a system for responding to emails more quickly (efficient), but failed to include important information in those emails (ineffective). On the other hand, one can also be efficient and ineffective. ![]() An employee may deliver a report that’s filled with valuable data that can help your department make more informed decisions (effective), but if they missed their deadline because they wasted time during the research process, that’s inefficient. It’s possible to work inefficiently and still be effective. If an employee is effective, they’ll consistently reach goals and objectives like delivering high quality-work or making sales. When we work efficiently, we use less time, resources, and/or human effort to do our job.Įffectiveness looks at the quality of the results we achieve. Get started with Head to head: Efficiency versus effectivenessĮfficiency and effectiveness are both related to productivity, but in different ways.Įfficiency refers to how we execute our tasks. In this post, we’re going to look at the differences between efficiency and effectiveness as well as how you can leverage both to help your teams maximize productivity. There’s even a productivity system based on this ideology known as the Pomodoro Technique.īut what if we’re focusing too much on efficiency when we should be looking at effectiveness as well? This makes sense considering how research indicates that our brains maintain concentration in cycles, which is why many psychologists and productivity specialists suggest taking scheduled breaks for a much needed mental recharge. If employees can work more efficiently, they can maximize the time they have. The common solution to low productivity is efficiency. ![]() Similarly, companies in the United States are losing an estimated $550 billion every year to low productivity, leaving managers scrambling to find ways to ensure work is being completed on time. According to a study in the UK, the average employee spends less than three hours a day doing actual work. If you’re working in a leadership position, there’s a high probability that improving employee productivity is one of your biggest objectives.ĭon’t worry, you’re in good company. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |